XR2i 8v Vs XR2i 16v

General Fiesta and car related topics.

XR2i 8v Vs XR2i 16v

Postby XR2i-Fiesta- on Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:10 pm

Just wondering what the perfomance differnces are between the 2?

which would people go for out of the 2 cars??

I've heard a lot of stories regarding both motors but just wondering which performs better? Ive heard of the 8v is much better and heard the 16v is also better!!?!?

So Id like to know! which is better?
XR2i-Fiesta-
Post Master
Post Master
 
Posts: 591
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 2:52 pm

Postby Xr_Dub on Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:36 pm

Image Image 1/4 Mile 13.769 @ 109.57 MPH 146.8 Mph Proven
Xr_Dub
Elite Post Master
Elite Post Master
User avatar
Posts: 5503
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 10:35 pm
Location: West London Baby / Ford Fiesta Xr2i 1.9 8v Turbo/ wants a Escort Cossie Next :D

Car: 1991 Ford Fiesta XR2i Turbo

Postby Jay on Sun Oct 29, 2006 9:00 pm

depends what you personally prefer.

I've had both and would choose 16v any day.
Image

Formerly Jay246
Jay
Elite Post Master
Elite Post Master
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 6:07 pm
Location: Birmingham

Car: 1992 Ford Fiesta RS 1800

Postby adz on Sun Oct 29, 2006 9:02 pm

XR2 :D :lol:
Image
adz
Elite Post Master
Elite Post Master
 
Posts: 5449
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 11:39 pm
Location: gloucester Drives:mk1 jetta

Postby knuckles on Sun Oct 29, 2006 11:30 pm

16v is slower - has less bhp :P

I ain't gonna start this argument again but two words need to be said regards the 16v...

Catalytic converter
ImageImage
~nomad~ :Good god I love Clark.
knuckles
Elite Post Master
Elite Post Master
User avatar
Posts: 6841
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 2:40 pm
Location: Hertfordshire
Your car: Fiesta Rs turbo

Postby Smo on Sun Oct 29, 2006 11:32 pm

My car is pretty much XR2i 16v spec, and I love how it goes. The only thing is the power seems to die off after about 5.5K I'd say.

Unfortunately I've only ever been in one XR2i 8v and that was a couple of days ago. Felt about the same to me I guess, but this one had an Ashley manifold and system, whereas mine is totally standard.

If I was to find an 8v and 16v both in the same condition, I'd most likely choose the 16v.

Thank you for reading my in-depth review :lol:

knuckles - If you can prove an 8v is quicker than my 16v, I'll agree with you, but until then :bonkers: :lol:
Image
Smo
Elite Post Master
Elite Post Master
User avatar
Posts: 8658
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 12:33 am
Location: My indecisive mind, in Thanet, Kent.

Car: 1990 Ford Fiesta Popular Plus

Postby knuckles on Sun Oct 29, 2006 11:35 pm

Smo :knuckles - If you can prove an 8v is quicker than my 16v, I'll agree with you, but until then :bonkers: :lol:


I'm only going by the factory bhp figures when they rolled off the production line. Wasn't referring to anyone's particular car.
ImageImage
~nomad~ :Good god I love Clark.
knuckles
Elite Post Master
Elite Post Master
User avatar
Posts: 6841
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 2:40 pm
Location: Hertfordshire
Your car: Fiesta Rs turbo

Postby Smo on Sun Oct 29, 2006 11:41 pm

Oh I know you weren't referring to anyone's, I just used mine as an example :)

I would be very surprised if there was any real difference between them, that's all. But I guess the figures have to come from somewhere...

Edit: That wasn't a dig either by the way knuckles, was just a light-hearted comment :bonkers: :lol:
Image
Smo
Elite Post Master
Elite Post Master
User avatar
Posts: 8658
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 12:33 am
Location: My indecisive mind, in Thanet, Kent.

Car: 1990 Ford Fiesta Popular Plus

Postby Max M4X WW on Mon Oct 30, 2006 12:10 am

Again :lol:
Max M4X WW
Elite Post Master
Elite Post Master
User avatar
Posts: 18161
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 9:52 pm
Location: Hampshire
Your car: Merc CL500

Car: 2014 BMW M135i

Postby XRMike on Mon Oct 30, 2006 12:16 am

Its down to personal preference tbh, both have their good values and bad values, and both are quite easy to tune. Id personally go for the 16v, as its a more modern engine,and IMO smoother than the 8v, but thats my opinion. Just make sure which ever one you go for has been looked after mechanically. :)
Image
XRMike
Elite Post Master
Elite Post Master
 
Posts: 2488
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 6:05 pm
Location: North Wales Party's: All the time

Car: 1991 Ford Fiesta RS Turbo

Postby knuckles on Mon Oct 30, 2006 12:24 am

no worries smo :Q
ImageImage
~nomad~ :Good god I love Clark.
knuckles
Elite Post Master
Elite Post Master
User avatar
Posts: 6841
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 2:40 pm
Location: Hertfordshire
Your car: Fiesta Rs turbo

Postby ~nomad~ on Mon Oct 30, 2006 2:46 am

8v is quicker. 16v is better. I have had a few of each :lol:
Image
:2004 Merc Vito: - :1983 Nissan Datsun 280zx: - :1992 GT Pro Series: - :2012 Mondraker Dune R:
~nomad~
Elite Post Master
Elite Post Master
User avatar
Posts: 12504
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2002 12:00 am
Location: hertfordshire
Your car: Breadvan

Postby Stoned on Mon Oct 30, 2006 8:43 am

Look they are both crap :P :lol:

Neither would even be listed as a mildly warm hatch now with a feeble 110bhp and useless brakes and suspension. The best thing that could be said of them (and this has always been the case) is that they still look decent with a change of alloys
Stoned
Elite Post Master
Elite Post Master
 
Posts: 8944
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 10:46 pm
Location: Portsmouth